There's a good thing about having giants fight for the throne. We benefit each time one of the giants give a blow to another giant. IE8, Safari, Firefox, and Chrome (a relatively new comer but strong enough to level with the old players) are now fighting for the throne fit for the king of the browsers. They give each other blows and every blow they give each other our browsing experience becomes better. When Chrome entered the scene it was already equipped with private browsing feature. The people at Chrome saw that IE8 and Safari have this feature in their bags so it was natural for them to think that it would help Chrome a lot to have it also. But Firefox do not have this feature built into it in its native state. Of course there's the Stealther addon but Firefox is now toying with (or actually working on) the idea of implementing this feature in the 3.1 release of the mighty Firefox browser before this year ends. Firefox's idea is to avoid writing data from private browsing sessions on your disk. This could be achieved by storing as much data from private browsing sessions as possible in memory. Here's how Mozilla explain it :
"The purpose of private browsing is to put Firefox into a temporary state where no information about the user's browsing session is stored locally. Firefox currently handles the user's privacy with a feature in preferences to clear all private data. This feature forces the user to choose between having privacy (even if only momentary), and other useful features like browsing history, and saved passwords. Users should be able to go "off the record", they shouldn't have to shoot the reporter. As we improve the functionality of history to include full text indexing, and possibly capturing thumbnails of sites visited, the need to respect user's privacy only increases."
But what's the point of adding this feature? If IE8, Safari, and Chrome have a form of this feature in them, probably they know that a lot of people (for various reasons, like viewing pr0n and downloading bootlegged stuff) do not want to leave traces of their online activities. Here's how Mozilla explain the use cases of private browsing :
"Many people believe that the primary use case for private browsing mode is viewing pornography. While viewing pornography may be a popular use case due to the nature of content on the Web, assuming that this is the only reason that users need private browsing trivializes the overall feature. For instance, users may wish to begin a private browsing session to research a medical condition, or plan a surprise vacation or birthday party for a loved one. Use cases will range from users cheating on their spouse, to users buying engagement rings. Given the breadth of our user base, specific use cases are likely to be extremely varied."
"The purpose of private browsing is to put Firefox into a temporary state where no information about the user's browsing session is stored locally. Firefox currently handles the user's privacy with a feature in preferences to clear all private data. This feature forces the user to choose between having privacy (even if only momentary), and other useful features like browsing history, and saved passwords. Users should be able to go "off the record", they shouldn't have to shoot the reporter. As we improve the functionality of history to include full text indexing, and possibly capturing thumbnails of sites visited, the need to respect user's privacy only increases."
But what's the point of adding this feature? If IE8, Safari, and Chrome have a form of this feature in them, probably they know that a lot of people (for various reasons, like viewing pr0n and downloading bootlegged stuff) do not want to leave traces of their online activities. Here's how Mozilla explain the use cases of private browsing :
"Many people believe that the primary use case for private browsing mode is viewing pornography. While viewing pornography may be a popular use case due to the nature of content on the Web, assuming that this is the only reason that users need private browsing trivializes the overall feature. For instance, users may wish to begin a private browsing session to research a medical condition, or plan a surprise vacation or birthday party for a loved one. Use cases will range from users cheating on their spouse, to users buying engagement rings. Given the breadth of our user base, specific use cases are likely to be extremely varied."
This feature is very much welcome though as of now I do not have reason to use it but it would be cool to have it handy in case I suddenly have the need to have it.
Comments
8 Responses to “Private Browing With Firefox?”
Post a Comment | Post Comments (Atom)
Add-on palang ito! Looks like it has been out in a while.
September 11, 2008 at 11:49 PMI think Firefox will soon be integrating private browsing in their browsers.
Nakakabagal kasi ang add-on.
true. and for persons who are uncomfortable tweaking firefox, even just a little, it's so much easier when the functionality comes out of the box.
September 12, 2008 at 1:51 AMPastilan!
September 12, 2008 at 3:23 AMKontak mo nga ako sa bariles (at) gensantos (dot) com.
Need your help for the MBS2.
Ayo-ayo! Salamat pud diay! :)
http://www.gensantos.com
Or else join ka sa Bloggers Meet-up on Sunday, Sept 14, 2pm here at the gensan city mayor's office.
September 12, 2008 at 4:18 AMThis is for the volunteers of the MBS2.
Text me at 0919-5808282 OR 0928-5066817.
cIAO!
The incognito windows in Chrome is still an indispensable means to browse a site.
September 12, 2008 at 5:27 AMNagde-date pa rin kami ni Chrome. But I still use Firefox to drop Entrecards and edit my Blogger template.
@Gem it seems that you are, at the moment, having a love affair with this new guy Chrome :)
September 12, 2008 at 8:21 AM@kouji yes it would be better if the feature comes out of the box. Addons slow down the software a bit and some people just do not have the heart to do some tweaks because for them it feels like brain surgery.
@Bariles cge muadto ko sa imo blog unya para makakuha ug info about MBS2, i'd like to join and be of help :)
many of my Japanese friends are convincing me to try Chrome
September 12, 2008 at 9:34 AMbut I'm still loyal sa Firefox 3 hehe
anyway, di issue sa akin yang private browsing
iba-iba naman kasi ang accounts namin sa computer sa bahay... so we cannot view the other person's browsing history
but I think it's good and bad at the same time
thanks for dropping by :)
September 13, 2008 at 2:54 AMPost a Comment